[TAS] Solo UW all escort Mindblades dead 5:49

Submit any record not fitting in the above categories
BackTwoBaySix
Posts: 168
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2021 3:27 am
In-game name: Back Two Bay Six
Guild: Aria

[TAS] Solo UW all escort Mindblades dead 5:49

Post by BackTwoBaySix »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKEiVFKB3JQ

I stopped recording but escort did go on to complete while I tabbed out, probably age 9

Frs_
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 224
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2021 7:16 pm
In-game name: I Dont Like Germans
Guild: kys / eC

Re: [TAS] Solo UW all escort Mindblades dead 5:49

Post by Frs_ »

I dont see escort done :/

BackTwoBaySix
Posts: 168
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2021 3:27 am
In-game name: Back Two Bay Six
Guild: Aria

Re: [TAS] Solo UW all escort Mindblades dead 5:49

Post by BackTwoBaySix »

Luckily I didn't say escort done, I said escort mindblades dead

BackTwoBaySix
Posts: 168
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2021 3:27 am
In-game name: Back Two Bay Six
Guild: Aria

Re: [TAS] Solo UW all escort Mindblades dead 5:49

Post by BackTwoBaySix »

This should be approved along with this viewtopic.php?f=36&t=2831

You should moderate based on the rules defined here: viewtopic.php?f=36&t=2535 not based on your own person belief about what should constitute a record in this category

Flo
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1366
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 4:23 pm
In-game name: Hi Im Undercover
Guild: Golt

Re: [TAS] Solo UW all escort Mindblades dead 5:49

Post by Flo »

Disagree, else next someone posts a "Solo UW all escort Mindblades dead as Mesmer primary" or a "Solo UW 6 escort Mindblades dead without using shroud" record.

A line needs to be drawn somewhere, and of course, yet again, I am sure we will have 100 people with 110 different opinions where that line should be (see the whole standard debate). Thank god this isnt my problem anymore, good luck

Frs_
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 224
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2021 7:16 pm
In-game name: I Dont Like Germans
Guild: kys / eC

Re: [TAS] Solo UW all escort Mindblades dead 5:49

Post by Frs_ »

The rules state that you can post anything, not that I have to put every other thing posted on the table. Feel free to post whatever you want here but for the table's readability i won't include some in (:

BackTwoBaySix
Posts: 168
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2021 3:27 am
In-game name: Back Two Bay Six
Guild: Aria

Re: [TAS] Solo UW all escort Mindblades dead 5:49

Post by BackTwoBaySix »

I'm done with this fucking place

Misty
Posts: 560
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:19 am
In-game name: ____ of the Owls
Guild: Illumination Theory [IT]

Re: [TAS] Solo UW all escort Mindblades dead 5:49

Post by Misty »

Please continue to post records on here, Bay6. I agree with Frs that this kind of thing doesn't need to go on the table, but I do support your right to post it on the site, and if anyone does want to see it, they can use the search function. More importantly though, records in the main categories should always be shared, so the tables can be accurate.
Flo wrote:
Wed Apr 20, 2016 10:56 am
Sadly, Misty is right.

Johannes
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2018 9:03 am
In-game name: Psychotic Overlord
Guild: DC

Re: [TAS] Solo UW all escort Mindblades dead 5:49

Post by Johannes »

Misty wrote:
Mon Mar 07, 2022 11:39 am
and if anyone does want to see it, they can use the search function.
Unfortunately the search function is garbage since it ignores numbers.

BackTwoBaySix
Posts: 168
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2021 3:27 am
In-game name: Back Two Bay Six
Guild: Aria

Re: [TAS] Solo UW all escort Mindblades dead 5:49

Post by BackTwoBaySix »

Misty wrote:
Mon Mar 07, 2022 11:39 am
they can use the search function.
For me GWSCR has only ever been about organizing records in an accessible way, and for me, its failing to do that. Unfortunately getting someone to “approve” your record is the only way for that to happen. I’m personally interested in lots of “Other Records” which aren’t on the table, and I’d never know to search for them (e.g. I’d never search for this viewtopic.php?f=36&t=2720 but I still like it), the only reason I saw it originally was because I saw the active topic. Without approval, and after a topic is no longer “active”, then pretty much no one will ever see it again. That’s a shame.
Misty wrote:
Mon Mar 07, 2022 11:39 am
More importantly though, records in the main categories should always be shared, so the tables can be accurate.
In my opinion, removing standard was retarded, allowing mods specific to each area was retarded, approving these mods was retarded. The fact some parts of this site are moderated (and to different standards) and some not, is retarded. @Misty look at the UW tables, do they look accurate to you? Since I joined I've had to to watch this place fall from its former glory into the shit show it is today.

Out of all the categories, other records shouldn’t be the place for a gatekeeping. I accept the points raised about drawing a line, as that is just common sense, the real argument is whether the threads I mentioned were encompassing enough.

For other records specifically, I’d rather just have a list of interesting things/records which is more encompassing organised in a sensible way. Elite Area subtasks table (or whatever the mods are trying to protect) can just be moved off it into the “Elite Area Records” forum (not on the main table), as a suggestion. Do what you want though, I don't care about GWSCR anymore.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 128 guests