[TAS] Solo Kath 6 Min [Aria]

Submit your current-meta and all-time dungeon records
Post Reply
BayTwoBaySix3
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2021 3:27 am
In-game name: Back Two Bay Six
Guild: Aria

[TAS] Solo Kath 6 Min [Aria]

Post by BayTwoBaySix3 »

Video: https://youtu.be/ImmGCpBR8hY
Screens: https://imgur.com/a/mtmK2Rs

This will be a controversial one for sure.

Lets just remind ourselves of the vote:

2.3.1: Should the TAS category allow everything, even if it is about performing actions that are not possible in the boundaries of the unmodified version of the game itself (for example: dialogs with fighting NPCs, targeting minipets)? If no, then this would mean a full video requirement for TAS records needs to be enforced.
24 Yes, 3 No, 1 I don't care

Pure is going to be possible you just need 2x clutch rupts on shield of fire and axe warriors (which I didn't even get here)

@Smiles race you to 6 min pure ;)

Flo
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1179
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 4:23 pm
In-game name: Hi Im Undercover
Guild: Golt

Re: [TAS] Solo Kath 6 Min [Aria]

Post by Flo »

The only thing questionable about this record is that I did not see a F11 at first glance. Automation of gameplay is allowed to any extent in the TAS category.

Flo
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1179
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 4:23 pm
In-game name: Hi Im Undercover
Guild: Golt

Re: [TAS] Solo Kath 6 Min [Aria]

Post by Flo »


for TAS, alltime! Since there is no F11 and we do not support other proofs for meta, this can not be listed on the current meta tables.

Minute based: 6min
Second based: 08:30.5 by making an estimate based on video time

Sylars
Posts: 186
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 7:32 am
In-game name: Musical Was Dub
Guild: [DS]

Re: [TAS] Solo Kath 6 Min [Aria]

Post by Sylars »

Guess I was one of the only three 'No' votes.

BayTwoBaySix3
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2021 3:27 am
In-game name: Back Two Bay Six
Guild: Aria

Re: [TAS] Solo Kath 6 Min [Aria]

Post by BayTwoBaySix3 »

IMO that should of been a seperate vote after it was decided that standard was be to removed... It was not smart to vote on that without knowing if standard would be removed or not. If standard remains -> allow everything in TAS. If not -> maybe don't allow everything in the only non-pure category.

This is one of the reasons I voted to keep standard...

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests