Guild Wars Speed Clear Records

thanks, that is interesting! it's probably not hugely impactful for larger parties, but still good to know (=

why is this still on the minute-based table? it should be trumped by this: viewtopic.php?f=34&t=2585

nice one! I'm not really interested in going for solo, but am curious what you've learned about the seals (= is it applicable for larger party sizes? and will you go for mission+bonus?

from a brief watch, it looks like most of the time you managed to cast SF while the phoenixes were out of range, so not too much luck involved (= you did get rupted on Shroud at least once though...

well, how many runs failed because of Leech Signet? if you're willing to pop rocks for this, go ahead and do an even faster run where you don't get rupted at all =P

seeing a mesmer (or even A/Me, if that helps with surviving?) solo Urgoz would be very cool (= regardless, gz on the 12 and good luck for the 11!!!

gz on beating Back by 1 player and 1 second =P

and if anyone does want to see it, they can use the search function. Unfortunately the search function is garbage since it ignores numbers. Yeah that is a shame, but if people really want to look at all the "other records", they can just look through this sub-forum . That takes barely more effort t...

Please continue to post records on here, Bay6. I agree with Frs that this kind of thing doesn't need to go on the table, but I do support your right to post it on the site, and if anyone does want to see it, they can use the search function. More importantly though, records in the main categories sh...

1) A standard record is considered better than a TAS record, as it has a more limiting ruleset. As an example, the new 6-man DOA record would on paper be considered more impressive as the same time was achieved under a stricter ruleset. So, people opt to play standard to prevent this from happening...