b) allow nothing so yup i totally agree with you.
Anyway, THANK YOU FOR YOUR HARD WORK FLO - if you wanted i could've pmmed you the results 4 months ago but i guess you enjoy wasting time :^)
No I meant I helped flo making the poll :/Nika wrote:Yes you made toolbox and thus forced this vote in the long run <3 :p
but yes, you're right. If I didn't make toolbox public I could have hacked all I wanted without the community knowing about it
Heh, at least you didn't have to manually pop pcons for years - who misses that? (edit: 6 people!)
- Posts: 529
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:19 am
- In-game name: ____ of the Owls
- Guild: Illumination Theory [IT]
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2017 3:19 pm
- In-game name: Olfo Pve Mode
- Guild: Dhuum Stucker [DS]
http://gwscr.fbgmguild.com/viewtopic.php?f= ... 6883#p6883
My keyboard can record keystrokes and repeat them in my writing/typing-speed when using a hotkey.Flo wrote:Allow macros to execute multiple keypresses in STANDARD records? NO
So tell me, how do you want to strictly enforce the rule you're advertising.
Ur the angel, i'm the devil. 6778 here. allowed evvverythingMisty wrote:I don't miss popping pcons manually, but the idea of that OP nonsense being allowed in a category that forbids visual AIDS like the TB minimap is rather ludicrous, so I voted no =P
b. Allow forced slow loads WITHOUT A TOOL in STANDARD records? NO (58.3%, 24 votes)
If say, a certain 8 people that voted NO to b) actually voted YES it would look like this:
a. Should newly discovered glitches and techniques be allowed by default, as long as they are performed without the help of 3rd party tools? YES (76.9%, 26 votes)
b. Allow forced slow loads WITHOUT A TOOL in STANDARD records? YES (75%, 24 votes)
Which would make a lot more sense since these are essentially the same question.
so a 8man team which is not using ANY tools, will do a TOOL ASSISTED RECORD by doing a slowload w/o ANY tools?
ppl are mixing up glitchless with TAS...
im not allowed to slowload by my own skills cuz other ppl dont know how to do it?
but yes, bond monitor is for standard fine, i guess thats logical
I do not accept this shit!
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests