Misty wrote:If you think that dissent is new, you need to brush up on your history. I for one have been saying for ages that we need greater representation than just 5 unelected mods who never meet up to discuss anything.
haskhasin wrote:I am interested in other people's opinion, but this won't solve the issue imho. The mod team is biased and was not chosen as a representative group. We were chosen to enforce rules, not make them.
Jang wrote:Maybe you should reconsider the way of collecting their opinions. I mean at the end of the day it's not very satisfying to get to vote yes or no on another persons ideas.
Cruz wrote:I'm very surprised this even has to be said. Since our rule set is arbitrary from the get go, shouldn't it be obvious that the people involved should have a say in how we want them? Let's be fair, the amount of people who even care about gw speedruns is small, and those who compete for them are even fewer. These are the people who should be involved in shaping the rules and ensuring this happens should be a priority for the moderators.
Eva is impressed wrote:Yeah like I already said earlier I think mods should only be there to edit the record threads (and eventually remove the dick pics or kitchen spams).
Dont act like this whole "majority" and "representative" thing is my idea. Most of the quotes can be found here: http://gwscr.fbgmguild.com/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1998
. And again: We re not really talking about a vote in this thread, we re talking about a way to establish a system that will eventually allow people to make a decision about how a voting system should look like.