Search found 558 matches
-
+
- Wed Aug 31, 2016 5:45 am
- Forum: Mission Records
- Topic: 7 min duo Bloodstone Fen + bonus [FBGM]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2218
-
+
- Tue Aug 30, 2016 6:55 pm
- Forum: Mission Records
- Topic: 4 min duo d'Alessio Seaboard + bonus [FBGM]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2448
4 min duo d'Alessio Seaboard + bonus [FBGM]
The new toolbox minimap pretty much did this mission for me so full credits to Has.
https://youtu.be/jbNLpq8axYU
https://youtu.be/jbNLpq8axYU
-
+
- Fri Aug 19, 2016 10:52 am
- Forum: Mission Records
- Topic: 5min Duo (Solo + Dunkoro) Consulate Docks
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3599
Re: 5min Duo (Solo + Dunkoro) Consulate Docks
LMAO after "7 min, definitely not doing this again", you shave off a minute and a half! Good job, although with these tactics I think it's a bit harsh to call it solo + Dunkoro... that would be like calling my Venta Cemetery a solo, when I clearly got carried by Koss.
-
+
- Fri Aug 19, 2016 6:18 am
- Forum: Other Records
- Topic: [other] 5min Solo Heart of the Shiverpeaks (Cyndr)
- Replies: 12
- Views: 11446
Re: 5min Solo Heart of the Shiverpeaks (Cyndr) Alltime Recor
Technically this is definitely a dungeon - it completes a page in your dungeon book, and contributes to your Master of the North title. It even gives you a dungeon chest at the end. However, calling it a record... well, that to me seems idealistic rather than practical, simply because in order to re...
-
+
- Tue Aug 16, 2016 2:29 am
- Forum: Dungeon Records
- Topic: 19min Solo Shards of Orr Alltime Record by Flo
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5225
Re: 19min Solo Shards of Orr Alltime Record by Flo
you should show your videos to that guy on reddit so he can beat Flo xD
https://www.reddit.com/r/GuildWars/comm ... rd/d6idb5a
https://www.reddit.com/r/GuildWars/comm ... rd/d6idb5a
-
+
- Wed Aug 10, 2016 2:32 pm
- Forum: Guild Wars
- Topic: wtb non retarded rounded down minute times
- Replies: 87
- Views: 56077
Re: wtb non retarded rounded down minute times
I didn't say the area itself had to be RNG based... just that good RNG is required to get the perfect time, which is true if the fastest tactic uses Sniper Support. I suppose if you could guarantee perfect RNG, it would actually be a useful skill in a lot more areas.
-
+
- Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:09 am
- Forum: Guild Wars
- Topic: wtb non retarded rounded down minute times
- Replies: 87
- Views: 56077
Re: wtb non retarded rounded down minute times
however all of this said, places where randomness is not that huge of a factor, i believe seconds based is useful for places like some dungeon records and mission records, but i believe it is ridiculous in other areas. Can you name a single area (including missions) where RNG can't cost you some se...
-
+
- Tue Aug 09, 2016 4:31 am
- Forum: Guild Wars
- Topic: wtb non retarded rounded down minute times
- Replies: 87
- Views: 56077
Re: wtb non retarded rounded down minute times
That system doesn't seem to make sense, Jang... for example, If I did a Frostmaw's run with these times: 1:00, 2:00, 3:00, 2:00, 2:00, that's 10:00 altogether, and I'd get the current meta record. If I then did a run with a different build that cost 59s on all levels except level 3, where I saved 1s...
-
+
- Mon Aug 08, 2016 4:07 pm
- Forum: Guild Wars
- Topic: wtb non retarded rounded down minute times
- Replies: 87
- Views: 56077
Re: wtb non retarded rounded down minute times
Anyway, what about old dungeon records? In my opinion they should be kept alongside second-based times as long as they are able to compete. It's not fair to dismantle them or to remove them entirely without knowing what was achieved. It's not that simple, though... if a video doesn't exist, you ass...
-
+
- Sun Aug 07, 2016 8:38 pm
- Forum: Guild Wars
- Topic: wtb non retarded rounded down minute times
- Replies: 87
- Views: 56077
Re: wtb non retarded rounded down minute times
If we do implement seconds-based records, there should be a 30 day wait between making the decision and implementing the rule, so current record holders can prepare to defend their records. At the moment, there is no incentive to push past x:59, because the current rules, whether or not you agree wi...