Search found 108 matches

+
by Luke
Wed Oct 08, 2014 9:33 am
Forum: Elite Area Records
Topic: Duo UW 62min by Hektor + Felix [RIP]
Replies: 6
Views: 9083

Re: Duo UW 62min by Hektor + Felix [RIP]

WTB CREDIT FOR THE GAKI IDEA!!

shouldnt forget about chris and marc tho as they actually invented most of the tactics.

All that being said gz and gg very impressive.
+
by Luke
Mon Oct 06, 2014 8:02 am
Forum: Elite Area Records
Topic: DoA 4 men 34min by pRma
Replies: 11
Views: 12661

Re: DoA 4 men 34min

Served
+
by Luke
Sun Oct 05, 2014 2:33 am
Forum: Elite Area Records
Topic: 30min 4men UW by [RIP]
Replies: 14
Views: 16018

Re: 30min 4men UW by [RIP]

lol
+
by Luke
Sun Sep 14, 2014 5:51 am
Forum: Elite Area Records
Topic: Trio FoW 12min // (+8man tie)
Replies: 13
Views: 15912

Re: Trio FoW 12min // (+8man tie)

Just record with ur cellphone, that way we also know if ur not using forbidden substances while doing the record like xanax to calm your nerves etc.
+
by Luke
Sun Sep 14, 2014 4:16 am
Forum: Vanquish Records
Topic: Mqsc solo......
Replies: 11
Views: 13249

Re: Mqsc solo......

All this fellatio talk is giving me a hard on. Normally I dont get a hard on reading gwscr except when it comes to UW records.

just my 2 cents
+
by Luke
Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:50 am
Forum: Guild Wars
Topic: Updated SC Timer
Replies: 40
Views: 44523

Re: Updated SC Timer

this is beyond retarded
+
by Luke
Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:49 am
Forum: Vanquish Records
Topic: Mqsc solo......
Replies: 11
Views: 13249

Re: Mqsc solo......

You just dont have the balls to compete with elite skill records imo!
+
by Luke
Sat Sep 06, 2014 6:30 am
Forum: Guild Wars
Topic: A new rule
Replies: 37
Views: 39130

Re: A new rule

icryabouttoolbox wrote:I don't do uw, I do fow
Shame on you.
Moonzy wrote:this is dumb as fuck
Looks like you and the new rule got something in common already

On a more serious note I like this rule, it has balls and I hope it works out.

good work james
+
by Luke
Thu Sep 04, 2014 3:13 pm
Forum: Guild Wars
Topic: A new rule
Replies: 37
Views: 39130

Re: A new rule

Quality over Quantity